<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Pope Vigilius on Philosophy Structured Notes</title>
		<link>https://aphinum.com/tags/pope-vigilius/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Pope Vigilius on Philosophy Structured Notes</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:02:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://aphinum.com/tags/pope-vigilius/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>The Controversy over the Three Chapters</title>
				<link>https://aphinum.com/posts/the-controversy-over-the-three-chapters/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aphinum.com/posts/the-controversy-over-the-three-chapters/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Controversy over the Three Chapters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The controversy over the Three Chapters refers to a theological dispute that arose in the Eastern Roman Empire during the 6th century. At its core, the debate centered on the orthodoxy of three Fathers who were suspected of Nestorianism: Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyrus, and Ibas of Edessa.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The controversy emerged as a result of the Council of Chalcedon (451 CE), which had pronounced these three Fathers heretics due to their perceived sympathies with Nestorius. However, many in the Eastern Roman Empire, including the empress Theodora, rejected this decision and continued to venerate the Three Chapters. This led to a rift between the Western Church, which adhered to the Council&amp;rsquo;s decisions, and the Eastern Church, which refused to abandon the Three Chapters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
